UPV Digital RepositoryUPV-DRUniversity of the Philippines Visayas
 

Undergraduate Theses

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14583/13

Browse

Filters

2000 - 20092

Settings

Keyword: search.filters.keyword.Trace metals

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Determination of instrument detection limit and method detection limit of Varian 55B flame atomic absorption spectrometer for cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese and zinc using sips-10 and manual sample introduction methods
    Calawigan, Roland Joseph C. (Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, 2009-04)
    Determination of detection limits is an essential measure of performance for a quantitative laboratory, method or analyst. In this study, the Instrument Detection Limit (IDL) and Method Detection Limit (MDL) of F-AAS Varian 55B for cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese and zinc were determined using the SIPS-10 and manual sample introduction methods. For IDL determinations, EPA’s SW-846 method (Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste and Physical/Chemical Methods) was employed for both sample introduction methods where deionized water was analyzed for twenty times for three non-consecutive days. MDL determinations were done based on the definition given by the United States Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR part 136, Appendix B - Definition and Procedure for the Determination of the Method Detection Limit). In this procedure, MDLs were estimated by calculating the standard deviation from the analysis of a standard solution containing the analyte with a concentration determined from the estimated detection limit, which was also analyzed for twenty times. Results showed that for the determination of IDL, all of the elements have lower values (Cd 0.000887 mg/L, Cr 0.00435 mg/L, Cu 0.000128 mg/L, Fe 0.000816 mg/L, Pb 0.000742 mg/L, Mn 0.000985 mg/L, Zn 0.000585 mg/L) for the manual method than the SIPS-10 method (Cd 0.00399 mg/L, Cr 0.0150 mg/L, Cu 0.00222 mg/L, Fe 0.00913 mg/L, Pb 0.0217 mg/L, Mn 0.00132 mg/L, Zn 0.00445 mg/L). For MDL, the results showed variations for both the two sample introduction methods. The MDL values for cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese and zinc are 0.0374 mg/L, 0.0235 mg/L, 0.00203 mg/L, 0.0197 mg/L, 0.0805 mg/L, 0.00325 mg/L and 0.00686 mg/L in the manual method, respectively and 0.0101 mg/L, 0.0429 mg/L, 0.00280 mg/L, 0.0186 mg/L, 0.19 7 mg/L, 0.00312 mg/L and 0.0103 mg/L in the SIPS-10 method, respectively. Both methods have comparable precision for copper, iron, manganese and zinc determinations while SIPS-10 method is more precise for cadmium, chromium, and lead analysis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparative study of trace metals and common impurities of table salt produced in Leganes, Iloilo and Tibiao, Antique
    Calawag, Jerolet E. (Division of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, 2000-10)
    Trace metals such as cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr) and lead (Pb) as well as the common impurities in salt like magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), sulfate, moisture, matter insoluble in water (MIW) and matter insoluble in acid (MIA) were analyzed using spectrophotometric (Flame Atomic Absorption &UV-vis Spectrophotometers) and gravimetric methods. Results showed that percentage concentrations of magnesium and calcium were significantly higher in sample A (Tibiao table salt) than in sample B (Leganes table salt) at 1- percent level of confidence. The percentage concentrations of MIW, MIA, moisture and sulfate were significantly higher in sample B than in sample A. Results of Uv-vis absorption spectroscopy indicated that both chromium and cadmium were absent in both samples while the lead concentrations in samples A and B were 10.9190 and 11.4831 ppm respectively. At 5% level of probability, the lead concentrations of both samples did not differ from each other. Using another technique of analyzing trace metals, the flame atomic absorption spectroscopy based on flame atomization, different results were obtained. Lead concentration in samples A and B were 6.4874 and 9.4977-ppm salt respectively. At 5 % level of probability, sample B had higher lead concentration than in sample A. The lead concentrations in both samples were all higher than 0.015 ppm, the allowable maximum limit of lead in water, or any drinks. The over-all results showed that sample B had higher contaminants than in sample A.